<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dynamic range</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelcsnell.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/18/dynamic-range/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelcsnell.com/blog/2009/02/18/dynamic-range/</link>
	<description>michael c snell photography blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:34:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://michaelcsnell.com/blog/2009/02/18/dynamic-range/comment-page-1/#comment-16576</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelcsnell.com/blog/2009/02/18/dynamic-range/#comment-16576</guid>
		<description>Heh... I know. Sad, isn&#039;t it? It really started as an excuse to see what Apple&#039;s Numbers software could do but I have to say that it is helping me stay on target.

The shadow detail is there on the D300 as well but I really need to do a side-by-side with the two bodies to compare. Most of this trip I had the 17-35 f2.8 on the 700 and the slower 24-120 on the 300. Not really a fair test. When I get to it, I&#039;ll post the results here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230; I know. Sad, isn&#8217;t it? It really started as an excuse to see what Apple&#8217;s Numbers software could do but I have to say that it is helping me stay on target.</p>
<p>The shadow detail is there on the D300 as well but I really need to do a side-by-side with the two bodies to compare. Most of this trip I had the 17-35 f2.8 on the 700 and the slower 24-120 on the 300. Not really a fair test. When I get to it, I&#8217;ll post the results here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce L. Snell</title>
		<link>http://michaelcsnell.com/blog/2009/02/18/dynamic-range/comment-page-1/#comment-16491</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce L. Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelcsnell.com/blog/2009/02/18/dynamic-range/#comment-16491</guid>
		<description>You know I love you man, but seriously... a graph of your progress?

Love that first frame by the way.  The shadow detail IS great and once again I&#039;m wondering if I need one of those bad boys (D700).

-Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I love you man, but seriously&#8230; a graph of your progress?</p>
<p>Love that first frame by the way.  The shadow detail IS great and once again I&#8217;m wondering if I need one of those bad boys (D700).</p>
<p>-Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.302 seconds -->

