100723bridgepan_sotc

With my recent investment in new hardware and software updates, I’m finally making a real time-investment in putting together my master Lightroom catalog. When I first went digital (after dabbling for a while, I made the serious switch in 2003), I archived all of my RAW files to DVD. Everything that wasn’t ridiculously hopeless got archived. Then I made my tweaks to the best shots and archived those, provided them to stock agencies, etc. My file names are chronological so the only real way of finding things was by searching by the date of the shoot. That, and I had a crude Extensis Portfolio database that provided thumbnails of all of my images and their pathnames, which showed which DVD they were stored on.

That was my system until a year or two ago when I began to migrate to using Adobe Lightroom as my main image cataloging system. I believe it was my trip to China in late 2008 when I began processing everything through Lightroom instead of Bridge and ACR. Everything from that point forward was in Lightroom, but everything prior was still in my old non-system.

Now, as I have downtime between shoots, I’m making the effort to add my digital files from 2003-2008 to my master catalog in Lightroom. After that is done, I’ll need to address my scans from transparencies that predate 2003, but that’s another kettle of fish.

The beauty of re-processing some of these older images is that they can often be improved by the advances made in RAW processing software in the intervening years. The shot at the top of this post is one example. Shot in the fall of 2003 while working on a story about Indiana’s covered bridges, this was originally three vertical shots. The plan was to use them to make a panorama in Photoshop, but it was a time-consuming task at the time.

100723bridge_sotcHere was the situation: This particular covered bridge was located right next to a newer, concrete bridge that replaced it. They were so close together that I couldn’t get the whole bridge in frame with my 17mm lens because there was no room to back up. This photo of the two bridges gives you some idea of the setting.

So, I did what I could do. I backed up under the concrete bridge until it was just out of view. Then I fired off three vertical shots from left to right, making sure I had plenty of overlap along their common edges. I planned at the time to eventually stitch these three photos into a panorama, but I knew it would take some time to correct the wide angle distortion, mask the overlapping edges and tweak the sky and water to get a seamless blend. I set them aside for later.

“Later” came when I imported this shoot into my new Lightroom catalog last week. Seven years have passed and now stitching a panorama is automated. In Lightroom, you can select the three images and go under the Photo menu to Edit In > Merge to Panorama in Photoshop. The software takes it from there and you end up with a seamlessly blended, distortion corrected panorama in no time. Now I have one more covered bridge shot in my library.

Many other tools have been improved in the last seven years and I’ll share some other salvaged photos as I move through the files. It seems like Adobe’s image editing suite has arrived to a point where I can be comfortable making this kind of a huge time commitment to cataloging my images now, without having much worry that I’ll regret taking this path a year or two down the road. Sure, I expect things to continue to improve, but the overall system now feels mature enough to move ahead with confidence that time isn’t being wasted. That’s a good feeling.

Next up: a couple of small things that aren’t completely obvious in Lightroom that make life much easier…


4 Responses to “Breathing new life”  

  1. 1 Paul Emberger

    We have a similar story. I, too, went completely digital in 2003. I used Capture 1 for raw editing and iMatch for my catalog. It was a bear of time. I cataloged by a very precise image/folder name convention, for fear of not being able to find anything if iMatch ever crashed.

    I made the switch to Light Room in 2007, with V1.0. I am so glad, I have never looked back. I still maintain the same file/folder naming scheme, but now I have more confidence in my catalog. And am loving reprocessing images. So far I have only gone back to early 2005… I still have a ways to go.

    I look forward to reading more about this adventure for you.

    Be well.

    -Paul

  2. 2 Administrator

    Thanks, Paul. You know… I think that going into the digital transition with a solid file and folder naming structure was critical. I’m glad I got that right early on as it has made everything else much simpler. It was a struggle to come up with at first — I switched from filing slides geographically to naming digital files chronologically — but consistency has paid off. Now, with Lightroom, I’m back to having the convenience of geographical files through the use of keywords and my folder structure. One of these days I should do a post on that. I’d love to hear more about your system.

  3. 3 DT

    This is one of the reasons that I always shoot RAW. As new software comes along and my knowledge of editing in those applications improve I can always return to the image and make improvements as needed.

    Do you keep all your files in one LR Catalogue? I was wondering if this slowed it down or made it unwieldly? I have recently thought of having a number of different catalogues travel/commercial/personal thinking this would make it more manageable in the long term.

    Safe Travels
    Dave

  4. 4 Administrator

    Dave — sorry for my late response. I just upgraded WordPress and found your comment in the que.

    I do keep everything in one Lightroom catalog for now. So far, it’s not sluggish at all. I can see the advantage of multiple catalogs but I’m not sure it would work for my situation. It would probably make the most sense for me to divide by country or continent, but then I can see someone requesting photos of “dogs in villages around the world” or something and I wouldn’t be able to do one search on “dogs + village”. Maybe a strange example, but I get some strange image requests.

    If you had two definitely distinct parts of your business, say… executive portraits and landscape, then it would probably work very well to separate the two and keep the sizes smaller.

    - Michael

Leave a Reply